It's only three isn't it (unless you're counting all the questions seperately)? I was stuffing one of them up all over the place though, maybe that confused you?
Icon 3 is best IMO because its closer up, which is more dramatic for a small size image. Also, the side-on framing in the first two separates them, whereas the over-the-shoulder shot makes it easier to identify and its more intimate in general. You can get more of a sense of their expressions too. Actually the back of Harry's head in that shot reminds me a little of Beaker from the Muppets.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-23 01:59 pm (UTC)Yes, yes I have.
Date: 2007-07-23 02:18 pm (UTC)It's only three isn't it (unless you're counting all the questions seperately)? I was stuffing one of them up all over the place though, maybe that confused you?
Re: Yes, yes I have.
Date: 2007-07-23 02:33 pm (UTC)Polls are good, I just wasn't expecting to see one behind this cut!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-23 10:06 pm (UTC)Icon 3 is best IMO because its closer up, which is more dramatic for a small size image. Also, the side-on framing in the first two separates them, whereas the over-the-shoulder shot makes it easier to identify and its more intimate in general. You can get more of a sense of their expressions too. Actually the back of Harry's head in that shot reminds me a little of Beaker from the Muppets.
p.s. I heart that Dean icon!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-29 01:47 am (UTC)OMG BEAKER. I can't even look at the icon without seeing him now.
Really, I hesitate to offer with icons being so easy to make nowadays and all, but you're welcome to it if you like.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-29 09:48 pm (UTC)