sarren: (Default)
sarren ([personal profile] sarren) wrote2007-09-12 08:32 pm
Entry tags:

Hee.

I was going to ask if anyone was going to tape The Chasers tonight, as Dragonfly is currently studying in the lounge room and also, I am snuggled up comfily in bed, but then I figured if they can make the effort to bust APEC security wide open then I can make the effort to turn the telly on. I will even resist the advance footage.

I love articles about 'mixed responses'. Somehow they always overwhelmingly favour whatever side I'm NOT on. Clearly I should actually be making my vote count.

[identity profile] victorian-tweed.livejournal.com 2007-09-12 12:52 pm (UTC)(link)
If you had missed it, you can watch it or download it from the ABC site:

http://www.abc.net.au/tv/guide/netw/200709/programs/LE0602H015D12092007T210000.htm

[identity profile] sarren.livejournal.com 2007-09-12 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Yays!

Also, hello beautiful.

[identity profile] victorian-tweed.livejournal.com 2007-09-12 01:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Hullo!! *hugs*

Because I love links the way you love polls:

http://www.entropyhouse.com/penwiper/who/extermaknit.html

/random




[identity profile] sarren.livejournal.com 2007-09-12 01:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Adorable :)

[identity profile] psycho-tabby.livejournal.com 2007-09-12 02:42 pm (UTC)(link)
You're anti Chaser? *surprised*

Can I ask why?

(I thought that article was pretty positive towards Chaser)

[identity profile] sarren.livejournal.com 2007-09-12 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I love The Chasers. I was referring to how the media sensationalise stuff with meaningless polls.

I hurt that you could doubt me. *looks sad*

[identity profile] psycho-tabby.livejournal.com 2007-09-12 02:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I really couldn't work it out, I thought you had put a not in there by accident. The first bit sounded really pro chaser, but reading that article it came across as pro as well. I don't get the meaningless polls bit? I'm missing something...?